“Right to work” sounds like it's about freedom. The history says otherwise — it was built to keep working people divided and powerless, and the data shows it's still doing exactly that.
Where "Right to Work" Actually Came From
In 1936, a Houston oil industry lobbyist named Vance Muse founded an organization called the Christian American Association, backed by Southern oil companies and Northern industrialists. Muse is credited as the architect of “right-to-work” as a political slogan — and his motivation had little to do with individual liberty.
Muse was an open White supremacist. He opposed unions specifically because they organized Black and White workers together, and he built his right-to-work campaign around warning Southern Whites that unions would force them into integrated organizations as equals. That messaging worked. By 1944, Arkansas and Florida had passed the nation's first right-to-work laws, and a dozen more Southern states followed within a few years.
In 1936, a Houston oil industry lobbyist named Vance Muse founded an organization called the Christian American Association, backed by Southern oil companies and Northern industrialists. Muse is credited as the architect of “right-to-work” as a political slogan — and his motivation had little to do with individual liberty.
Muse was an open White supremacist. He opposed unions specifically because they organized Black and White workers together, and he built his right-to-work campaign around warning Southern Whites that unions would force them into integrated organizations as equals. That messaging worked. By 1944, Arkansas and Florida had passed the nation's first right-to-work laws, and a dozen more Southern states followed within a few years.In 1947, Congress passed the Taft-Hartley Act, which gave states the legal authority to adopt right-to-work laws nationwide. More than 80 percent of Southern Democrats in both the House and Senate voted for it — not as an abstract economic policy, but as a direct response to labor unions' integrated organizing drives across the South. Right-to-work laws weren't designed to protect any worker's freedom. They were designed to break the specific kind of power that comes from working people organizing across racial lines — because that power was starting to work.
That history matters, because it explains what right-to-work laws still do today: they weaken the exact kind of solidarity that gives working people leverage, regardless of who's affected by it now.
What It Built: Lower Wages, Higher Poverty
Look at the numbers today, and the pattern set nearly 80 years ago hasn't disappeared — it's just lost its original language.
Workers in right-to-work states earn about $6,109 less per year on average than workers in other states. Poverty rates run higher too: 15.3 percent overall in right-to-work states, compared to 12.8 percent elsewhere — and for children, the gap is even starker, 21.4 percent versus 18.0 percent. Nine of the ten states with the highest poverty rates in the country are right-to-work states. Eight of the ten states with the lowest poverty rates are not.
The damage doesn't stop at paychecks. Right-to-work states spend nearly a third less per student on K-12 education than other states, and infant mortality rates run more than 12 percent higher. These aren't isolated statistics — they're what happens systematically when working people lose the collective power to demand better wages, better schools, and better healthcare for their communities.
The 50-Year Arc: How Union Decline Built Today's Poverty
Right-to-work laws are one piece of a much larger, decades-long story, and the trend line is stark.
Since 1979, worker productivity has grown nearly three times faster than typical worker pay. In that same period, earnings for the wealthiest 0.1 percent of Americans grew 354 percent, while earnings for the bottom 90 percent grew just 44 percent. That gap didn't happen by accident — it happened as union membership collapsed, falling from over a quarter of the workforce in the early 1970s to roughly one in ten workers today.
Researchers have found that the decline in union coverage explains about 35 percent of the shrinking share of middle-class workers in America, and that the erosion of unions accounts for roughly three-fourths of the growing wage gap between middle- and high-earning workers. Put simply: as union power went down, working-class poverty and inequality went up — and right-to-work laws were built specifically to drive that decline.
This is the throughline connecting all of the articles on the home page. It's why seniors' Social Security is at risk. It's why construction workers face higher fatality rates and nurses fight for safe staffing. It's why Gen Z works harder for less than any generation before them. Right-to-work laws didn't cause every economic problem working Americans face — but for nearly 80 years, they've been quietly making every one of those problems worse.
Reclaiming the Real Meaning of "Right to Work"
Every American should have the right to a job that pays enough to live on, provides real benefits, and treats them with dignity. That's a right worth fighting for. It's just not the right that “right-to-work” laws were ever designed to protect.
The version we have today was built to keep working people divided so they couldn't bargain together. The data shows it's still working exactly as intended — lower wages, higher poverty, weaker schools, and a shrinking middle class, concentrated in the states that adopted it first and hold onto it hardest.
Here's what you can do:
✔ Vote for candidates who support repealing right-to-work laws
✔ Share the real history of "right to work" — most voters have never heard it
✔ Support union organizing in your community, whatever industry it's in
✔ Connect the dots for others: lower wages, weaker schools, and higher poverty aren't separate issues — they're the same issue
The American Dream didn't vanish on its own. Policies like this one had a hand in it — and policies can be undone.
References
1. Facing South — The racist roots of 'right to work' laws
https://www.facingsouth.org/2012/12/the-racist-roots-of-right-to-work-laws
2. Dissent Magazine — The Ugly Racial History of "Right to Work"
https://dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/the-ugly-racial-history-of-right-to-work/
3. American Constitution Society — Vance Muse and the Racist Origins of Right-to-Work
https://www.acslaw.org/expertforum/vance-muse-and-the-racist-origins-of-right-to-work/
4. Salon — Big business and white supremacy: The racist roots of America's "right-to-work" laws
https://www.salon.com/2018/06/07/big-business-and-white-supremacy-the-racist-roots-of-americas-right-to-work-laws/
5. Gigafact — Are states with right-to-work laws more likely to have above-average poverty rates?
https://gigafact.org/fact-briefs/are-states-right-work-laws-more-likely-have-above-average-poverty-rates/
6. BCTGM (Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union) — The Truth About Right-to-Work (For Less)
https://bctgm.org/right-to-work-is-wrong/
7. Economic Policy Institute — Life Is Worse in Right-to-Work States
https://www.epi.org/blog/life-worse-work-states/
8. Center for American Progress — What Do Unions Do for the Middle Class?
https://www.americanprogress.org/article/what-do-unions-do-for-the-middle-class/
9. Economic Policy Institute — The case for tripling union membership
https://www.epi.org/publication/the-case-for-tripling-union-membership-how-rebuilding-union-power-would-strengthen-workers-the-economy-and-our-democracy/
10. Economic Policy Institute — Unions, inequality, and faltering middle-class wages
https://www.epi.org/publication/ib342-unions-inequality-faltering-middle-class/
If you are on Social Security and Medicare, here is why you need to vote to end wage-suppressing “right-to-work” laws — and start supporting organized labor
Most people think the biggest danger to Social Security and Medicare is “government spending” or “the national debt.” But the real threat is something much simpler:
Working Americans aren’t being paid enough
Social Security and Medicare are financed by the paychecks being earned right now, today. These programs are not funded by some distant trust fund or by congressional promises — they are powered by payroll contributions from current workers. Every time wages fall behind, these programs fall behind too.
Meanwhile, as anyone living on a fixed income knows, the cost of everyday life keeps going up. Housing, groceries, insurance — everything outpaces the raise most workers receive. And when wages fail to keep up with the real economy, it becomes harder and harder for Social Security and Medicare to stay strong.
CEO Pay Has Soared—Worker Pay Has Not
Since 1980, pay for top executives has exploded, while middle-class wages have barely budged. The gap between CEOs and the people who make their companies run is now wider than at any time in modern history.
Economists estimate that the top 1% have captured $50 trillion in income over the past four decades that would otherwise have gone to the bottom 90% of Americans. That figure comes from research cited in Time magazine and the RAND Corporation. This massive shift of earnings upward has directly weakened the payroll base that Social Security depends on.
Why Suppressed Wages Threaten Social Security and Medicare
By law, 12.4% of every paycheck (split evenly between workers and employers) funds Social Security, while 2.9% funds Medicare. If wages are stagnant — or if workers are pushed into gig jobs, temp jobs, or low-wage jobs — those programs lose the very money they rely on.
Today, wages for the bottom 90% of Americans have been stuck for decades while productivity and corporate profits have reached historic highs. That means:
· Less money available for Social Security and Medicare
· More pressure on Congress to cut benefits
· Greater financial risk for seniors who depend on these programs
Even worse, the cost of essential goods has soared far faster than take-home pay. Housing is the clearest example.
Housing Costs Have Hit Historic Highs
Harvard researchers report that home prices have risen to five times the median household income, approaching the highest level ever recorded.
For working families, this means less disposable income, less financial security, and fewer payroll dollars going into Social Security and Medicare.
When America’s workers struggle, America’s seniors struggle soon after.
How “Right-to-Work” Laws Hurt Seniors
Supporters say these measures protect workers from being compelled to support a union. Right-to-work laws sound positive — who doesn’t want the “right to work”? But the name is misleading.
In practice right-to-work laws weaken unions and reduce worker bargaining power.
States with right-to-work laws have:
· Lower average wages
· Fewer benefits
· Higher workplace fatality rates
· Less employer-provided health coverage
· Lower worker retirement savings
· Lower union participation across the board
And since low wages mean weaker payroll tax revenue, right-to-work laws directly undermine Social Security and Medicare.
In fact, a study from the Center for American Progress found that rising income inequality — driven in part by weaker labor protections — has already cost Social Security hundreds of billions of dollars in lost revenue.
States That Have Repealed Right to Work Laws
A growing number of states are recognizing the damage these laws cause and have moved to repeal them:
· Indiana (2012) – implemented RTW but has since faced reconsideration efforts
· Michigan (2023) – first state in decades to repeal its RTW law
· Illinois (2018) – passed a statewide amendment prohibiting local RTW ordinances
· Other states, including Missouri and New Hampshire, have rejected or blocked RTW laws after strong public pushback
Momentum is building toward restoring worker power — but seniors need to help push it over the finish line.
Better-Paid Workers Strengthen the Entire Economy
Decades of research show:
· Businesses with well-paid workers have lower turnover
· Workers with stable incomes spend more in their communities
· Higher wages lead to stronger local economies
· Union workplaces are more productive and have greater worker retention
· Higher median wages lead to stronger Social Security financing
When unions are strong, wages rise. When wages rise, Social Security and Medicare stay strong.
What Seniors Can Do
If you rely on Social Security and Medicare — or expect to rely on them soon — you have a stake in this fight.
Here’s what you can do:
Whether one favors unions, tax reforms, labor-market changes, or some combination of policies, the underlying challenge remains the same: Social Security and Medicare ultimately depend on the earnings of American workers.
Strong Wages = Strong Social Security + Medicare
For decades, America has allowed worker pay to fall behind while corporate executive pay has skyrocketed. The result is predictable: weakened retirement programs, stressed younger generations, and seniors being told they “have to take cuts.”
That’s not acceptable.
If we want Social Security and Medicare to remain strong, reliable, and fully funded for decades to come, then seniors — the largest and most consistent voting bloc in America — must insist on policies that lift American wages.
And that begins with ending wage-suppressing right-to-work laws and restoring the power of organized labor.
References:
Here’s How Much America’s Rising Income Inequality Is Costing Social Security
The Top 1% of Americans Have Taken $50 Trillion From the Bottom 90%—And That’s Made the U.S. Less Secure
https://time.com/5888024/50-trillion-income-inequality-america/
American Dream or Nightmare, US Top 1% Siphoned 79 Trillion From the Bottom 90% Over Five Decades Research Reveals
Home Prices surge to five times median income, nearing historic highs
https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/blog/home-prices-surge-five-times-median-income-nearing-historic-highs
CEO compensation is up 1,000% from what it used to be. Worker pay? Not so much.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/ceo-pay-worker-difference-211239592.html
Data show anti-union ‘right-to-work’ laws damage state economies
If you want to understand why Nevada has a "right-to-work" law, don't start with economic theory. Start with a strike.
On July 2, 1949, the Culinary Union walked out on the Reno-Sparks area. Hotel maids, bellhops, telephone and elevator operators, cooks, and bartenders demanded to be included in union contracts — and demanded higher pay. Forty-two bars closed. Workers walked out at 55 restaurants. The Employers Council threatened to shut down every member business rather than give in.
The union won that fight. And Nevada's business establishment never forgot it.
Within a year, a coalition calling itself the "Committee of One Thousand" had gathered signatures for a ballot measure to gut union power statewide. It passed in 1950, passed again in 1952 (Nevada uniquely requires initiatives to win twice), and took effect in 1953. That law — misleadingly branded "right-to-work" — didn't emerge from some neutral policy debate. It was built, on purpose, to make sure workers could never again organize the way the Culinary Union just had.
Seventy years later, the law is still on the books. Here are three groups of Nevada workers who would see real gains if it were repealed.
Hospitality & Casino Workers: Winning Anyway, Despite the Law
Nevada's tourism economy runs on the Culinary Workers Union Local 226 — over 60,000 members strong across Las Vegas and Reno, one of the largest and most effective union locals in the country. And despite decades of right-to-work status, Local 226 has kept its membership well above the national private-sector average through sheer organizing effort.
The results speak for themselves: Local 226's most recent five-year contracts with major gaming companies delivered a 10 percent wage increase in the first year alone, building to a 32 percent increase over the life of the contract — nearly $2 billion in total compensation for more than 40,000 hospitality workers.
Here's the catch: right-to-work laws don't just weaken the union that exists — they suppress the ones that could exist. Smaller hotels, motels, and short-term rentals across Nevada remain almost entirely non-union, and workers there don't see anything close to Local 226's gains. Right-to-work makes organizing harder everywhere it hasn't already succeeded. Imagine what's possible for the rest of Nevada's hospitality workforce without that headwind.
Construction Workers: This Is a Safety Issue, Not Just a Wage Issue
Construction is one of just three industries — alongside education and public administration — where right-to-work laws hit hardest. Research shows these laws are associated with union membership drops of nearly 13 percentage points and wage declines of more than 4 percent within five years, concentrated almost entirely in these fields.
But for construction workers, the damage isn't only financial. It's physical. A study published in Occupational and Environmental Medicine found that as state unionization rates rise, workplace fatality rates fall — by roughly 2.7 to 2.8 percent for every one-point increase in union density. The same study found that a rise in the construction, mining, and logging share of a state's workforce is associated with a meaningful increase in fatality rates. Put simply: weaker unions mean fewer safety protections, and in an industry where the stakes are literally life and death, that's not an acceptable tradeoff.
Nevada is one of the fastest-growing states in the country, and construction is one of the industries powering that growth. The workers building Nevada's future deserve the bargaining power to make sure they come home safe every night.
Nurses: Better Pay, Better Staffing, Better Patient Care
Nevada's healthcare workforce — like most of the South and Mountain West — has notably low union density, in part because of right-to-work laws. That gap has a price tag: a 2024 analysis by the Economic Policy Institute found that unionized nurses earn approximately 12 percent more than non-union nurses, even after adjusting for experience and location.
But the nurses' union story isn't only about paychecks. Nurses' unions have been the driving force behind the fight for safe staffing ratios — the number of patients a single nurse is responsible for during a shift. California, which mandates ratios statewide, did so because of union advocacy, and the connection between adequate staffing and patient survival is well documented. Nevada currently has no comprehensive staffing ratio law.
Joe Lombardo Vetoed A Bill That Could Have Saved Numerous Lives
A JAMA study of over 170,000 surgeries across 168 hospitals found a 31% higher likelihood of patient death within 30 days when nurses were assigned 8 patients each instead of the safer 4-to-1 ratio. A separate cost-effectiveness study of ratio laws found that 14 states have introduced legislation to limit patient-to-nurse ratios after research confirmed the staffing-outcomes link. Nevada was among them. The popular bi-partisan Senate Bill 182 sailed through both the Nevada Senate and Assembly, but was ultimately vetoed by Governor Joe Lombardo.
Nevada currently has no comprehensive nurse staffing ratio law.
That means this isn't just an issue for nurses. It's an issue for every Nevadan who's ever been a patient — or will be one.
What This Means for Nevada
These aren't three random professions. They're three of the workforces Nevada depends on most: the tourism economy that defines our state, the construction economy building its future, and the healthcare system every one of us relies on eventually. Right-to-work laws don't just cost these workers money — in construction, they cost lives, and in healthcare, they compromise the care all of us receive.
Nevada's right-to-work law wasn't written to protect anyone's freedom. It was written in direct response to workers winning — and it was designed to make sure they couldn't win that easily again.
Here's what you can do:
✔ Support candidates who call for repealing Nevada's right-to-work law
✔ Support hospitality, construction, and healthcare workers when they organize
✔ Ask candidates directly where they stand on right-to-work — and hold them accountable
✔ Share the real history of this law with friends and neighbors who think "right-to-work" sounds like a good thing
The Culinary Union proved in 1949 that Nevada workers can win when they stand together. It's time to remove the law built to stop them from doing it again.
References:
Culinary Union Local 226 — Culinary Union and 'right to work' in Nevada https://www.culinaryunion226.org/news/clips/culinary-union-and-right-to-work-in-nevada
KNPR — Culinary Union and 'right to work' in Nevada https://knpr.org/show/nevada-yesterdays/2024-08-19/culinary-union-and-right-to-work-in-nevada
Culinary Union Local 226 — Culinary Union celebrates 90 years of winning for workers in Nevada https://m.culinaryunion226.org/news/press/culinary-union-celebrates-90-years-of-winning-for-workers-in-nevada
Las Vegas Hospitality Authority — Unions and Labor Relations in the Las Vegas Hospitality Industry https://lasvegashospitalityauthority.com/las-vegas-hospitality-unions-labor-relations/
Senator Jacky Rosen's office — Rosen Celebrates Culinary Union's New Contracts https://www.rosen.senate.gov/es/?p=11378
NBER — Impacts of Right-to-Work Laws on Unionization and Wages https://www.nber.org/digest/202208/impacts-right-work-laws-unionization-and-wages
Occupational and Environmental Medicine (via Fair Contracting) — Does 'right to work' imperil the right to health? https://faircontracting.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/RTW_PAPER_OEM.pdf
AFL-CIO — Death on the Job: The Toll of Neglect, 2026 https://aflcio.org/dotj-2026
Nurse License Guide — Nursing Unions in 2026: What to Know https://nurselicenseguide.com/blog/2026-04-02-nursing-unions-pros-cons/
Nurse License Guide — Nurse Staffing Ratio Laws by State https://nurselicenseguide.com/blog/2026-04-27-nurse-staffing-ratios-by-state/
ScienceDirect — Nursing unions: A scoping review of outcomes for employees, patients, and administrators https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424001854
Improving nurse-to-patient staffing ratios as a cost-effective safety intervention. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/improving-nurse-patient-staffing-ratios-cost-effective-safety-intervention
You already believe in unions. The numbers prove it. So why isn't your job unionized — and what's actually standing in the way?
Young Americans approve of unions more than any other generation alive. Adults under 34 back organized labor at a higher rate than every older age group, and it isn't close. Yet most Gen Z workers still clock in without union protection. The disconnect isn't attitude — it's opportunity. Roughly 40 percent of workers aged 16 to 24 work in food service, retail, or hospitality — exactly the industries where right-to-work laws have made organizing hardest and union density lowest. You want in. But the system was built to keep you out.
That gap matters more than ever right now, because Gen Z isn't just facing a tight job market — you're facing a full-blown affordability crisis. Student debt in America has topped $1.7 trillion. Rents rose nearly 29 percent nationally between 2020 and 2024 while paychecks crawled upward far slower. A recent survey found that over 70 percent of Gen Z and millennials say "survival spending" — covering the basics, nothing more — is now their financial normal, and only 32 percent still believe the American Dream is attainable. This isn't a talking point. It's the water you're swimming in every time you check your bank balance before payday.
Right-to-work laws are part of why that water keeps rising. Here's where the fight actually is.
If you or someone you know has worked in a warehouse, you already know the pace is brutal. The data backs up what you've felt.
At Amazon — the largest employer in the warehouse sector — worker injury rates have repeatedly been found to run far above the rest of the industry. One federal analysis found Amazon's injury rate was 71 percent higher than non-Amazon warehouses of similar size. A separate investigation into New York facilities found injury rates 40 percent higher than non-Amazon warehouses in the same state. Another report tracking serious injuries — the kind that force workers off the job entirely — found Amazon's rate more than double the industry average.
This isn't an accident of the work itself. It's a business model that pushes speed over safety in workplaces with little union presence to push back. Where warehouse and retail workers have organized — including recent, hard-won campaigns at Amazon and Starbucks locations — they've won real safety and pay improvements. Right-to-work laws make every one of those campaigns harder to start and harder to win.
If you drive for a rideshare app, deliver food, or freelance through a platform, you've probably been told this arrangement gives you freedom. What it often actually gives you is a paycheck with no floor.
Workers classified as "independent contractors" instead of employees typically lose access to minimum wage guarantees, overtime pay, health insurance, and unemployment benefits — while employers save money by shifting those costs onto workers. Research from the Economic Policy Institute found that a typical misclassified worker loses out on roughly $9,529 a year in wages and benefits compared to a properly classified employee doing the same work.
The good news: this fight is winnable, and it's happening now. In 2025, California passed a law allowing rideshare drivers to unionize and bargain collectively for the first time — a direct result of organizing pressure. That's proof gig workers can build power even in an economy designed to keep them isolated. Right-to-work laws work against that same organizing everywhere they exist, making it legal for workers to benefit from union contracts without contributing to the fight that won them.
Put these pieces together and the picture is simple: the industries where Gen Z is most likely to work — warehouses, retail, food service, gig platforms — are the same industries right-to-work laws have kept weakest. That's not a coincidence. It's the system functioning exactly as designed, and it's a direct contributor to the affordability crisis you're living through. Lower union density means lower wages, fewer benefits, and less bargaining power at exactly the moment rent, debt, and basic costs are outpacing what a paycheck can cover.
You don't have to accept that as permanent. Unions built the 40-hour week, the weekend, and the modern minimum wage — not through goodwill from employers, but through organized workers using their power. That power is still available. Right-to-work laws exist specifically to make it harder to use.
Here's what you can do:
✔ Vote for candidates who support repealing right-to-work laws
✔ Support organizing efforts at warehouses, retail stores, and gig platforms — even if it's not your workplace
✔ If your job doesn't have a union, learn what it would take to start one
✔ Talk to friends and coworkers about what "right-to-work" actually costs — most people have never heard the other side of that story
You already believe in this. The next step is making sure your vote reflects it.
References:
1. Center for American Progress — Everybody Likes Unions https://www.americanprogress.org/article/everybody-likes-unions/
2. Center for American Progress — Why Gen Z Men Are the Most Pro-Union Generation in History https://www.americanprogress.org/article/why-gen-z-men-are-the-most-pro-union-generation-in-history-unions-build-stable-finances/
3. Power at Work — Gen Z's Experiences and Optimism Make Them Worker Power Warriors https://poweratwork.us/gen-zs-experiences-and-optimism-make-them-worker-power-warriors
4. National Employment Law Project (via NELP data brief) — Warehousing Pain: Amazon Worker Injury Rate https://www.nelp.org/app/uploads/2022/05/Warehousing-Pain-Data-Brief-2022.pdf
5. The Nation — Amazon Says Its Injury Rates Are Down. They're Still the Highest in the Industry. https://www.thenation.com/article/economy/amazon-injury-rate/
6. Gulf News (Reuters/Reveal investigation) — Report shows high injury rate at Amazon warehouses https://gulfnews.com/world/americas/report-shows-high-injury-rate-at-amazon-warehouses-1.1574785368244
7. People's World — Labor Board frees gig workers, others, to unionize (citing EPI's Heidi Shierholz) https://peoplesworld.org/article/labor-board-frees-gig-workers-others-to-unionize/
8. Miller Shah LLP — New California Legislation Renews Focus on Gig Worker Misclassification (AB 1340) https://millershah.com/blog/california-gig-worker-misclassification/
9. YIP Institute — The Cost of Living Crisis: Inflation's Lasting Effects on Gen Z's Economic Future https://yipinstitute.org/policy/the-cost-of-living-crisis-inflations-lasting-effects-on-gen-zs-economic-future
10. Fortune — The starter economy is broken https://fortune.com/2026/04/14/starter-economy-broken-affordability-gen-z-inflation/